Chapter 3: Follow-up studies in chronological order
Benjamin, 1964a
Private Practice, New York, NY, USA
The
author worked as a gerontologist, endocrinologist and
sexologist in private practice and remarked that he could
not realize any systematic scientific studies there. At
the end of the 1940s Alfred Kinsey transferred some
patients with transsexual symptoms to him. Following the
highly publicized surgery of Christine Jorgensen in 1952
in Copenhagen, his practice turned into "the"
address for people with transsexual wishes from the USA
and from abroad (comp. Memorial for Harry Benjamin
[1988], especially the articles by Schaefer and by
Jorgensen). This follow-up study and other publications
(comp. Benjamin, 1964b, 1967), his close collaboration
with doctors and psychologists of the renowned Johns
Hopkins University Hospital in Baltimore, MD, USA and his
monograph dated 1966 (Benjamin, 1966) most strongly
influenced treatment concepts for transsexual symptoms,
furthered hormonal and surgical procedures in particular
and contributed greatly in that universities then
dedicated their attention to the transsexual phenomena.
| Sample |
Females
(MFT) |
Males (FMT) |
| Total group* |
(91) |
(15) |
| Operated and followed-up |
31 |
|
*The author says that the
total group was 186 transvestites whom he had seen during
the previous 12 years and "examined and partly
followed for a shorter or longer period of time" (p.
108). Among these 186, 106 were transsexuals. It remains
unclear if the follow-up studies include all or only part
of those operated.
| Age at
Time of Surgery |
| Mean |
24 years |
| Range |
21-58 years |
| Type of
Treatment |
| Penectomy |
31 |
| Orchidectomy |
23* |
| Vaginoplasty |
25 |
*"In most of the
remaining ones" (p. 108, exact figures are lacking)
the testicles were transferred retro-peritoneally by the
method of Dr. Elmer Belt of Los Angeles.
| Follow-up
Time Since Surgery |
| Mean |
5 years |
| Range |
0.17-12 years |
Study
Methods
The evaluation of the results by the author
was done based upon clinical interviews and physical
examinations, as well as correspondence or reports of
friends and relatives.
Evaluation Fields and
Criteria
Relatively vague global conclusions were made,
in which the physical health, mental condition and social
integration of the "new woman" (p. 109) were
considered. If the follow-up study period for a
corresponding evaluation was not too short, then the
appearance and function of genitalia and sexual activity
were regarded. For a more detailed description of the
criteria, see Benjamin (1964b)
Results
The conclusion is evaluated as excellent for
16 females and for 11 as satisfactory. Four cases are
deemed as doubtful by the author, but none as
unsatisfactory. Six former patients married as females
and 17 had permanent relationships.
Case
Studies
To demonstrate the reasons that could lead to
the wish of a sex reassignment the publication contains a
short case study.
Follow-up Studies Mentioned
Hamburger et al., 1953
Authors' Conclusion
For the author "there can be no doubt in
my mind that transsexuals are entitled to treatment other
than psychotherapy which so often has proven futile and
costly" (p. 111). In carefully selected cases
hormonal and surgical treatment is indicated.
Indication Recommendations
"Most important to me for the indication is
the belief that a successful >woman< can result
from this operation, and that there is no other way to
help the patient toward an emotionally healthier and
happier future. Under >successful woman< I have in
mind appearance, a reasonably stable personality, the
consent of the family, and the assurance that the >new
woman< can make a living as such" (p. 108).
Remarks
Benjamin's publication can be considered as
a case presentation for the hormonal and surgical
treatment. For the surgery he uses the term
"conversion operation" (p. 110), probably as
translated from his German mother-tongue term
"Umwandlungsoperation," which was later
replaced by the term "sex reassignment
surgery."
|