|
|
Chapter 3: Follow-up studies in chronological order
Benjamin, 1966
Private Practice, New York, NY, USA
This first monograph about
transsexualism became, especially among US (American)
patients, a well-read text. The author reports about his
increased sample (comp. Benjamin 1964a, b, c). In the
appendix of the book there is an article by Lal about the
complimentary of genders and by Green a text about the
mythological, historical and transcultural aspects of
transsexualism and by Masters an article about
autobiographies of transsexuals.
| Sample |
Females
(MFT) |
Males (FMT) |
| Total group* |
(152)/(193) |
(20)/(27) |
| Operated |
51/62 |
10/11 |
| Followed-up |
46 |
15 |
| *The author gives a total group of
249/307 transvestites whom he had seen in the
previous years. Among them were 172 transsexuals.
The figures after the slashes reflect the figures
of the appendix of the book, dated December 15,
1965 (app. A, pp. 163-166). |
| Type of
Treatment* |
| Hormones |
51 |
Hormones 17 |
| Penectomy/ |
|
Breast reduction 10 |
| orchidectomy |
51 |
Hysterectomy/ |
| Vaginoplasty |
51 |
ovarectomy 9/8 |
| * The surgery was performed in
Denmark, The Netherlands, Sweden, Mexico, USA
(California) and Morocco. |
| Age at
Time of First Surgery |
| Mean |
33 years |
33.5 years |
| Range |
20-58 years |
|
| Follow-up
Time Since Surgery |
| Mean |
5-6 years |
|
| Range |
0.25-13 years |
|
Study
Methods
Interviews and physical examinations were done. Also
the correspondence with patients and information by
general physicians, friends or relatives were considered.
Evaluation Fields and Criteria
Evaluation fields and criteria are explicitly defined
only for females. The physical and mental health, social
situation, family relations and sexual functioning were
evaluated. The evaluation was done mostly analogous as in
Benjamin (1964a, b) to the mentioned ratings with the
only divergence that the best rating category was not
"excellent" anymore, but "good."
(comp. Benjamin 1964c).
Results
Females: In the overall rating the results
were 17 (33.3%) of the females considered as good, 27
(52.9%) considered as satisfactory, five (9.8%) as
doubtful; and one (1.9%) was considered in each of the
categories unsatisfactory, resp., unknown. The question
if they would undergo surgery again was answered
in the affirmative by the majority. One was hesitant and
two were undecided. The inclination of one or two was
toward the answer "no" because they had so much
pain and difficulties and that the results, especially
because of sexual difficulties, were not satisfactory.
More than half of the females had orgasms from
sex. Not having orgasms was only considered by a few
females as problematic. Major corrective surgery was
done for eight females, minor surgery for seven. After
surgery, 12 females married and 23 had sexual
relationships.
Males: Hormonal treatment and/or surgery had
increased the general satisfaction of patients. With the
exception of one male who reverted into the female role,
all patients were improved in the overall rating.
Six males married.
Case
Studies
As an example from the females, an unsatisfactory and
a satisfactory result are quoted. With males, some very
short cases were also quoted.
Role
Re-reversal
One female whose result was rated as unsatisfactory
had the intention to live as a male again. After
unsuccessfully trying to live in the role of a male, one
male returned to the female role and had a surgical
breast augmentation done after the original breasts had
been removed. "But she is not unhappy and has no
regrets" (p. 158).
Follow-up Studies Mentioned
Benjamin 1964a, b; Hamburger et al., 1953; Hertz et
al., 1961
Authors' Conclusion
"My observations have forced upon me the conclusion
that most patients operated upon, no matter how disturbed
they still may be, are better off afterward than they
were before: some subjectively, some objectively, some
both ways. I have become convinced from what I have seen
that a miserable, unhappy male transsexual can, with the
help of surgery and endocrinology, attain a happier
future as a woman. In this way, the individual as well as
society can be served. The rejection of the operation
and/or treatment as a matter of principle is therefore
not justified" (p. 135).
Remarks
Based on the heterosexual/homosexual evaluation
scale by Kinsey and his co-workers (Kinsey et al., 1948),
the author developed a Sex Orientation Scale (S.O.S.), by
which the transitions from transvestism to transsexualism
could be categorized. In some later follow-up studies,
this scale was used for the descriptions of the samples.
Overall this scale found little dispersion in the
scientific literature.
|