Chapter 3: Follow-up studies in chronological order
Alanko & Achté, 1971
Psychiatric University Clinic, Helsinki, Finland
This is the first
follow-up study of transsexuals published in Finland. The
authors called it a provisional report. In reality it
remains the only Finnish publication regarding this theme
(according to a personal note from K.A. Achté to F.P. on
November 13, 1989). It is not quoted by most authors of
later follow-up studies.
| Sample |
Females
(MFT) |
Males (FMT) |
| Operated total group* |
5 |
3 |
| Followed-up |
4 |
3 |
| *All
patients who lived at that time in Finland and
were operated. |
|
|
| Age at
Time of Surgery |
| Range |
27-47 years |
27-27 years |
| Type of
Treatment |
| |
|
Breast reduction** 1 |
| Penectomy/Orchidectomy* |
4 |
Hysterectomy/ovarectomy** 2 |
| Vaginoplasty |
4 |
Phalloplasty** 2 |
| *Testes implanted
supra-peritoneally. |
| **About the third patient it is
spoken in general terms about sex transformation
surgery. |
| Time period of the surgery: 1957-70. |
| Follow-up
Time Since Surgery |
| Mean |
2.75 years |
2.66 years |
| Range |
0.08-10 years |
0.08-5 years |
Study
Methods
The study methods and instruments are not
named.
Evaluation Fields and
Criteria
The results of the treatment are divided in
the relation of the pre-surgical findings in the
categories "better," "same," and
"worse". Results were evaluated as questionable
if the surgery happened less than six months earlier.
Case
Studies
All courses are described extensively. We take
over the symbolizing of patients with letters in the
publication.
Females: The patient #5 was only
operated one month before the follow-up study and was
classified as content. The patient #2 had lived
for 15 years in the USA and had met Harry Benjamin there,
who started her hormone treatment. In Finland an
application for castration was first denied but, despite
this, sex reassignment surgery was done. For a follow-up
study this female was not available. The patient #7 is
classified as worsened because she was very depressed and
unhappy with the surgical results. She was operated on
without pre-surgical hormone treatment. Patient #8 is
described as content. Her follow-up study period was six
months. Patient #1 -- who at age 28 had a
castration -- is called "homosexual" by the
authors. Two years later a penectomy was done and a
vagina was made, even though the patient had never lived
as a female before. Post-surgically he/she lived one year
as a female and lived with the parents. The authors
characterize him/her as paranoid, but not psychotic. At
the time of the follow-up study, ten years after surgery,
he was living again as a male. He said that now he
understood better why he previously desired a sex
reassignment. The authors evaluated his well being at
that time compared to the start of treatment as
unchanged.
Males: The situation of patient #3, whose
surgery (including phalloplasty) went back five years,
was evaluated as being better, even though it is said at
the same time "A thorough psychiatric follow-up
investigation has not yet been carried out" (p.
355). Patient #4 is classified after a three-year
follow-up study time as better. Patient #6 is
described as content, even though the surgery had been
performed only one month earlier.
Results
The results are represented in the form of
case studies. Overall, of the four females one
each is evaluated as better, questionably better, equal,
resp., worsened. Of the three males two were
evaluated as better and one as questionably better.
Suicide Attempts/Role
Re-reversal
The authors estimate the suicide risk of
transsexual patients as, overall, very high. Regarding
the patient #1, they speak about a reversal into the
previous male role with the same shape as pre-surgically,
not about a so-called re-reversal desire. There are no
reports about an explicit wish to reverse the surgical
steps.
Follow-up Studies Mentioned
Benjamin, 1964b, 1966; Hamburger et al., 1953;
Pauly, 1965; Randell, 1969; Wålinder, 1967.
Authors' Conclusion
The authors highlight that it is important to
note that surgical treatment as well as hormonal
treatment are only mosaic pieces of an intensive and
long-term psychiatric treatment of transsexual patients.
Therapeutic success cannot be achieved alone by
surgeries. They compare the state of the treatment
procedures for transsexuals to the lobotomy at the time
when it was introduced as psychiatric treatment.
"Apart from psychiatric and hormonal therapies, the
sex transformation operation is, for the present, the
only means at our disposal through which we can help in
certain severe cases a human being suffering from a very
grave disorder" (pp. 352).
Indication Recommendations
With emphasis the authors warn to use special
care with the extension of indication, for which they
presuppose a two-year-long psychiatric complimentary
treatment, if possible, one to two years of
psychotherapy, two years living successfully in the other
gender role, a stable personality and that "the
diagnosis is correct beyond doubt" (p. 352).
Psychoses and borderline personality disorders should be
excluded and mainly the continuous follow-up treatment
and continuing of supportive psychotherapy should be
guaranteed for years.
Remarks
The extensive case studies show how big the
insecurity of medical doctors was when being confronted
with patients with transsexual symptoms. Also in the
diagnosis as well as regarding the indication for the
different therapeutic measures, there seemed to be no
uniform concept: On one side, a patient was (at first)
denied the surgery despite a many-year-long hormonal
treatment (patient #2) . On another side, a patient (#1)
was operated without any previous hormonal treatment.
|