|
|
Chapter 3: Follow-up studies in chronological order
Kando, 1973
Dept. of Sociology, University of California,
Riverside, CA, USA
This is an ethnographic
field study of a partial sample of patients described by
Hastings (1974) and Hastings & Markland (1978) who
were treated in the Dept. of Psychiatry, University of
Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. The goal
of the research was to find out how females generally got
along after surgery and if there were any differences in
control groups. The author says that the 26 patients
indicated for surgery by Hastings, resp., Hastings &
Markland had been selected from hundreds of applicants
and were subjected to a schematic treatment regime so
that one can almost speak about an experimental design
where therapeutically responsible and differential
diagnostic thoughts had a secondary role. Corresponding
to their methodological principles, the research contains
long interview transcripts as case studies.
Sample
Seventeen females (MFT) were compared with two
control groups with 17 males, resp., females, each
(so-called "normal" females and males) who were
matched according to age, education, marital status,
religious beliefs, socio-economic status and number of
inhabitants of the place of birth.
| Type of
Treatment |
Females |
| Hormones |
17 |
| Breast augmentation |
17 |
| Penectomy/orchidectomy |
17 |
| Vaginoplasty |
17 |
| Time of surgery: 1968-69. |
| Follow-up
Time Since Surgery |
|
| Up to a maximum of two
years |
Study
Methods
All 17 females of the research group answered
a katamnestic questionnaire. Twelve females of the
research group were interviewed and tested (projective
procedures, MMPI). Some females were visited with their
families and/or escorted into the environment of their
sub-culture.
Evaluation Fields and
Criteria
In the center of the study were the social
relationships of the females. It was divided into two
groups - one who got along well ("passers")
and those who did not get along well ("non-passers").
Results
For the 10 passers: Their surgeries had
been a longer time before. They had no surgical
complications, were attractive females who normally would
not have been recognized as former males. They moved far
away from their hometowns, normally did not tell anything
about their previous history except in trusted
relationships, for example, to a permanent partner.
Pre-surgically they had mostly worn female clothing in
secret and avoided contact to the transsexual
environment. They came out of farming communities, came
from worker or lower middle class backgrounds, had no
particularly high education levels and fulfilled the
traditional role rigidly. For them the surgery was
necessary to harmonize the female identity they said they
always had.
For the non-passers: Their surgery generally
happened shortly before the follow-up study. There had
been complications. Generally the females were older, as
a rule did not look as good and were easily recognized as
former males.
Suicide Attempts
One female had attempted suicide after surgery
when her friend -- who was married to another female --
threatened to leave her.
Authors' Conclusion
The conclusion of the author is that females
after a sex reassignment behave overall more
role-conformed than females without a transsexual past.
Follow-up Studies Mentioned
Benjamin, 1964a, 1966; Hamburger et al., 1953;
Pauly, 1965; Wålinder, 1967
Remarks
This publication is the first sociological
description of a sample of operated patients with
transsexual symptoms and works with a comparison group.
This attempt is to be noted - even though the results of
the publication do not come to much at the end. It is
noteworthy that all females in the sample behaved
heterosexually after surgery. Exactly this finding --
that is not found so clearly in other follow-up studies
-- makes the validity of these results doubtful. A
possible explanation for this result is that the females
did not give the correct information but directed
themselves to the results believed to be expected by the
researcher, or that it is a sample effect caused by the
selection of patients for surgery. This publication gives
interesting views into the beginning of the gender
identity clinics of the 1960s and 70s in the United
States.
|