|
|
Chapter 3: Follow-up studies in chronological order
Wålinder, Lundström & Thuwe (1978)
Psychiatric Research Center, St. Jörgens's Hospital,
University of Göteborg, Sweden
In this publication
patients who regretted after gender role change, name
change and legal sex change (n=3), resp., additional
surgical sex change (n=2) are compared with those who
were treated surgically and after that, satisfied (n=9).
This publication does not belong among the follow-up
studies in the strictest sense, but is useful to distill
prognostically favorable, resp., unfavorable factors.
Eleven of the 14 described patients are regarded already
in Wålinder & Thuwe (1975).
Sample
Research group: Three MFTs who
wanted a reversal of their legal sex change-- that is
possible under Swedish law independent of surgery -- as
well as two other MFTs of a sample from Wålinder &
Thuwe (1975) who had already been operated and regretted
afterwards but did not apply to reverse the legal
classification as a female.
Comparison group: Nine females who were satisfied
with the results of the surgical treatment.
Study
Methods
The two MFTs out of the sample of Wålinder
& Thuwe (1975) were interviewed. For all other
persons exclusively the entries in the patient files were
used.
Evaluation Fields and
Criteria
The existence, resp., the non-existence of the
following criteria were evaluated: psychoses, mental
retardation, unstable personality, alcohol or drug abuse,
criminal convictions, capability to earn a living, social
support by the family, distance between patients'
residences and the treatment providers, physical
characteristics that do not fit in with the new gender
role, military service, heterosexual experience, strong
sexual interest and age at time of first medical contact.
Results
The group comparison shows that a sum score
formed by the first 12 prognostic factors is
significantly higher (p<.02) for the five "regret
cases" than for the satisfied persons. There were
significant group differences in the following variables:
unstable personality, criminal convictions, incapability
to earn a living, lacking social support by the family,
physical characteristics that do not fit in with the new
gender role, heterosexual experiences and a higher age at
the time of first inquiry about treatment possibilities.
Follow-up Studies Mentioned
Benjamin, 1966; Hertz et al., 1961; Hoenig et
al., 1971; Pauly, 1968; Randell, 1969; Wålinder &
Thuwe, 1975.
Authors' Conclusion and Indication Recommendations
In reference to the number of all persons who
desire a gender reassignment and receive it, is a portion
of those who regret this decision little. In view of the
small sample size the results should be interpreted
cautiously. The existence of a small number of
prognostically unsatisfactory factors is no absolute
contra-indication for treatment, but if there are more of
these factors at the same time, caution is necessary.
Also unfavorable can be the long-term interruption of an
"other sex" hormone treatment on one's
condition and the long-term result of treatment.
Remarks
This publication is one of the few that
distills prognostically unfavorable factors in a
methodologically clear cut way. It is to be seen
cautiously that the "regret cases" are put into
two different groups, namely pre-surgical patients, who
-- in accordance with Swedish rights -- can already
request and receive a name, resp., legal sex change and
two operated patients. The first group lived, so to say,
in the Real-Life-Test. In the Federal Republic of
Germany, the persons could only enforce a first name
change in accordance with the Transsexuals' Law. If they
abandon the wish for gender reassignment surgery in the
course of the experience they make in the new gender
role, nothing irreversible has happened. The name change
can be reversed at any time. This may be true for most
countries that allow legal sex change only after surgery.
Thus, the patient always has the option to return to
his/her former gender role as long as surgery and legal
sex change have not taken place.
|