|
|
Chapter 3: Follow-up studies in chronological order
Ball, 1981
Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne,
Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
This publication is
interesting because it describes the beginning of the
treatment of transsexuals in Australia. During his
education in England during the post-War years, the
author met, even before the popularization of the
category transsexualism by Cauldwell (1949), an
(Australian) patient who had the symptoms later described
as being transsexual symptoms. Until 1964 he regarded
surgical treatment methods for transsexualism extremely
sceptically. Even for patients who were constantly in
danger of losing their lives due to self-castration
attempts, he considered that "surgery is probably
best confined to some procedure which conceals rather
than amputates the male organs" (Roth & Ball,
1964, citing p. 41). He shows how the historiess of
transsexuals, as well as the treatment strategies by
doctors, adapted to the conservative expectations of
Australian society - for example, by negating homosexual
contacts.
| Sample |
Females
(MFT) |
| Total group* |
(209) |
| Operated** |
30 |
| Followed-up |
24 |
| *Patients of both sexes
from Great Britain, Canada, Australia and New
Zealand who had been treated personally by the
author over the course of 30 years. **This group is called
"the first Melbourne series" - so it is
probably not the total sample of operated.
|
Type of Treatment
Instead of representing the particulars
of the treatment in the follow-up study sample, only the
general proceedings of the Melbourne clinic is referred
to. According to this, after an ambulant or stationary
diagnosis, a two-year-long living in the female role was
necessary before an indication to surgery was made.
During this time hormone treatment was done. All
surgeries were performed before 1976 and, except for the
first two, all at one time.
About surgical complications it is said that five
females had problems with the vagina. For an older
patient, who had been operated as one of the first, half
the vagina was lost. Two patients had bladder fistulae
between surgeries that could successfully be tended to in
one case, but in the other, stayed open despite many
correction attempts. Another patient had a recto-vaginal
fistula that could be treated without permanent damage.
Finally, for one patient, the vagina was too small.
| Follow-up
Time Since Surgery* |
|
| Minimum |
2 years |
| *Because one patient had been
married for eight years, the patient's surgery
had to have been at least eight years earlier at
the time of follow-up study. The title of the
publication (Thirty Years' Experience With
Transsexualism) makes one suppose that, on
average, there were long follow-up study periods.
It is possible, too, that they were in reality
two years and that the longer "follow-up
study periods" were due to the fact that the
publication was done some years following the
termination of some research. All patients had
agreed to keep in contact with the author for at
least two years following surgery, an agreement
that was kept - with one exception. Follow-up study times are
not defined.
|
|
Study
Methods
Personal contacts with the author, who had
provided care for the patients before surgery. No
systematic documentation.
Evaluation Fields and
Criteria
The evaluation fields are partnership and
sexual functioning ability. Criteria upon which these
were evaluated were not mentioned.
Results
The profession, sexual activity and type of
partnership relations of 23 females are represented in
tabular form. All females were sexually active and four
had not described difficulties during sexual intercourse.
Five females had married and ten lived in permanent
relationships that had existed between one and eight
years. One patient had died - specifics are not given.
The author emphasizes the "technical excellence of
the surgical procedures ... and the good social
adjustment in most cases, with the patients leading
active, productive lives" (p. 42).
Single Case Studies
Two examples of prominent patients are described slightly
more in detail, namely, a patient of a Maori family with
eight sons, of whom, besides the described patient,
another sibling had sex reassignment surgery in Cairo;
one brother was homosexual and another a transvestite and
possibly also transsexual. Besides this, a patient from a
famous British family that reversed to the male role
after the death of the mother to come into possession of
the family's inheritance. This patient worked in her
profession as a male and lived with a female. After the
death of the partner she asked for new surgery because
the previously-made vagina was obliterated. But she could
distance herself from the wish for another surgery after
some time.
Suicide Attempts/Role
Re-reversal
Extortion attempts with suicide threats
conduced to an exclusion from the treatment program.
Quantitative references to this are not made. One female
lived again as a male for a while, but without any desire
to be re-reassigned (see single case studies).
Authors' Conclusion
The author emphasizes globally the excellent
technical quality of the procedures and the good social
adjustment of the females in most cases and attributed
the good results to the selection criteria of the
Melbourne team.
Indication Recommendations
The author has second thoughts that the
surgeries are made accessible for mentally hardly stable
patients, "and patients who may not be transsexual
at all but have been led by themselves and others to
believe they are so". The surgery for these
"inappropriate" cases "can be disastrous
and is irreversible. Prolonged psychiatric assessment
remains essential" (p. 43). Fundamentally, the
Melbourne treatment team requested one or multiple
hospitalizations for diagnoses, a two-year success in the
life in a female role and a hormone treatment before
surgery. To work in the prostitution environment was not
accepted as success in the female role. Contacts that
existed previously to the homosexual sub-culture had to
be given up by patients if they wanted to be treated.
Remarks
Remarkable is the indication of the author
that during the 1940s and 1950s MFTs almost exclusively
came for treatment and his simple explanation for it: the
"lack of adequate technical procedures allowing
penile construction for women" (p. 39). He worries
that, with the popularization of the diagnosis and the
treatment possibility, more and more patients come for
whom this type of treatment does not promise any
improvement. Because of this, he emphasizes the long-term
pre- and post-surgical psychiatric treatment. Which goals
are to be pursued by this treatment is mostly unclear.
|