|
A non-randomized comparative study of adjuvant chemotherapy after liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer.
The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on long term survival was studied in 202 patients following curative resection of hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma. Patients were stratified according to known risk factors into three groups. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy was examined for each group. Patients in the high and intermediate risk groups did not benefit from chemotherapy, while patients in the low risk group not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly better survival than treated patients. No benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy following curative resection of colorectal liver metastases was observed. Adjuvant chemotherapy following liver resection for colorectal metastases should not be used outside clinical protocols. |
||||||
| Introduction Colorectal carcinoma is the second most frequent cause of cancer death with increasing frequency in the western world. Almost half of the patients with colorectal carcinoma are cured by radical surgical resection of the primary tumour together with the corresponding lymphatic drainage area. At the time of initial diagnosis approximately twenty percent of patients present with synchronous liver metastases and approximately 10-15 percent develop metachronous liver metastases. Some 20 percent of patients with synchronous or metachronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer can be offered liver resection with curative intent. Five-year survival of these patients has been reported as 25 percent although recurrence-free 5-year survival is less than 20 percent [1]. Since perioperative mortality is consistently very low there is little room for improvement. Any improvement of longterm survival must, therefore, be attributed to patient selection rather than improved surgical therapy. Adjuvant treatment has therefore been administered in an attempt to improve longterm survival. Metaanalysis of randomized trials studying adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary colorectal cancer and lymph node metastases (UICC stage III) has concluded that adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy confers a small survival benefit of some 2-5 percent at 5 years. [2]. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been applied in a similar fashion to patients with curatively resected liver metastases of colorectal origin by the systemic, intraperitoneal intraarterial or intraportal route [3]. From some series using these treatment concepts 5-year survival of almost 40 percent has been reported, but rarely more than 20 patients were studied [4,5]. While the majority of studies were non-randomized and often retrospective, some randomized and controlled prospective trials have been announced almost a decade ago. However, to date little information has become available from these efforts. Either the respective trials have not been completed or they have not been formally published. Clear treatment strategies regarding adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of colorectal liver metastases have not been established. Since 1981, we have performed an increasing number of liver resections for metastatic disease. Although adjuvant chemotherapy has not been routinely recommended after potentially curative liver resection, a number of our patients has received adjuvant 5-FU based chemotherapy during the past 15 years. This was either because the patient specifically asked for such treatment or because physicians responsible for the patient after liver resection in their local community recommended such therapy. We are, therefore, able to examine in our patients the experience with adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Patient characterisation Between 1981 and 1995, 286 patients had liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer at the Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg. Surgical procedures included hemihepatectomies (27%), segmentectomies of various extent (38%), and wedge resections (27%). To be included in this study, liver resection had to be curative with macroscopically and microscopically free resection margins. Patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to liver resection as well as patients that had received adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of the primary tumor were excluded. Therefore, 75 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria of having curative liver resection and being chemotherapy 'naive'. All patients that died within 2 months postoperatively were excluded from survival analysis [n=9 (3,7%)]. Overall, 202 patients were eligible for the analysis. Due to the long observation period (1981-1995) and because a number of physicians were involved, chemotherapy regimens varied. However, all chemotherapy regimens included 5-fluorouracil. All study patients were followed until death or the end of the observation period for a minimum of 6 months and a median of 24 months. Potential prognostic factors were identified by a previous review of the literature and examined by univariate analysis. They included age, sex, stage and location of the primary tumour, time until treatment of liver metastasis, surgical margin (more or less than 10 mm), amount of blood lost during liver resection, grading, size and number of liver metastasis and other factors [1]. They were tested in the current study population and, if confirmed, subsequently entered into a multivariate analysis to identify risk factors independently associated with overall survival. Since the relative risks associated with each of the identified risk factors were comparable (TABLE 1), the relative risk of death could be described by the number of risk factors present. All patients were then assigned to three risk groups: one group with an expected low risk for treatment failure characterised by the presence of none, one or two risk factors, a group with a medium risk of treatment failure with patients carrying three risk factors, and finally a high risk group characterised by the presence of four or all five confirmed risk factors. After stratification for relative risk of death into three groups the survival of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of colorectal liver metastasis was compared to survival of patients not receiving postoperative 5-FU-based chemotherapy separately for each risk level. For statistical analysis SAS software, release 6.12, was used. The statistical end point of this study was overall survival from the date of liver resection. Cancer-related deaths were considered the events of interest for survival analysis. All other observed survival times including 'not cancer related' deaths were right-censored. Overall survival estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log rank test was used to analyse the difference between survival curves. Factors independently associated with overall survival were identified by multivariate analysis using Cox´s proportional hazard model. Step down regression methods were used to set up parsimonious statistical models for relating prognostic factors to the overall survival of patients with complete data. 153 patients were treated by liver resection without chemotherapy and 49 received adjuvant 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy. All potential prognostic factors were almost evenly distributed among patients receiving chemotherapy and those treated by surgery alone (Table 4). In a univariate survival analysis, 7 of 13 factors were found to correlate with overall survival in these patients. These included age, surgical margin, disease free interval, lymph node metastasis at the initial diagnosis, amount of blood loss during operation and grading of liver metastasis. These factors were then entered into a multivariate analysis, which identified five parameters significantly associated with treatment failure (Table 1). These included a high grading of the liver metastasis, a small resection margin (<1 cm), disease free interval <12 months, lymph node metastasis of the primary tumour, and an intraoperative blood loss exceeding 2 liters. All patients were then allocated to one of three risk groups. 113 patients were assigned to the low risk group (0-2 risk factors), 47 patients had a medium risk (3 risk factors) and 21 patients were in the high risk group (4 or all risk factors). The validity of the risk groups was confirmed by analysis of the overall survival in the defined risk groups. Patients with a low risk profile had a significantly better 5-year survival than patients with the medium or high risk profile 5-year survival was 35, 17 and 0 percent for low, intermediate and high risk groups. Table 1: Identification of independent risk factors for treatment failure after potentially curative resection of colorectal liver metastases determined by multivariate analysis.
We then examined the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in all patients and in the different risk groups. Regarding all patients (n=202), survival was better for patients treated by surgery alone (n=153) then in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n=49), but the observed difference was not significant (p=0.095; Figure 1). When high and intermediate risk groups were examined separately no significant difference in survival was observed in patients treated by adjuvant chemotherapy in the risk groups. However, in the group of patients with a comparatively low risk of treatment failure, patients treated by surgery alone had a significantly better overall survival than those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (Figure 2).
Resection of liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma has been established as the treatment of choice, if size and location of metastases permit complete removal of the tumor. Surgical treatment alone has resulted in five-year survival rates of about 25% in eligible patients. Although this must be considered very successful in patients with metastatic solid tumors, it still implies that the majority of patients are rendered tumor-free only temporarily and eventually will die from their tumor. Reports in the literature regarding the effect of 5-FU based adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative surgical resection of liver metastases are not uniform. Hughes and co-workers in a collective review of 155 patients observed a 5-year survival of 33% after systemic application of 5-FU. However, others following the same approach found that only 15% of patients survived for 5 or more years (6). Two groups used 5-FU intraarterially and found 5-year survival rates of 30 and 35%, but only 10 patients were treated in these studies (7,8). Finally, the largest study of adjuvant chemotherapy using different modes of application was published in 1992 by Nordlinger. In 666 patients, the 5-year survival rate after adjuvant chemotherapy was 25% (9). This rate is almost identical to results from a collective review of 3643 patients where 5-year survival was reported as 26% after liver resection alone (1). In this non-randomized study identification of risk factors allowed definition of patient groups at different risk for tumor-related death. In 202 patients undergoing complete resection of colorectal liver no evidence was obtained to indicate that adjuvant 5-FU based chemotherapy would improve long-term outcome of these patients. When patients were stratified according to presumptive risk factors it rather appeared that chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases was associated with a reduced long term survival in the subgroup of patients with a relatively good prognosis (low risk group). No significant differences were observed in the intermediate and high risk groups. These observations do not support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of colorectal hepatic metastases outside clinical studies.
Address for correspondence: |